Today's Religious Fuckwit June 6, 2007Posted by truthspew in doctors, gay bashing, Gay rights, keep your faith to yourself, puritanical, radicalism, religion, stupidity, vigilance.
I know that fuckwit isn’t a term everyone is familiar with so click the word to see the definition.
Anyhow I have to post the idiots letter verbatim since the Providence Journal requires registration and I’m loathe to subject my readers to that. The letter was of course titled “Lust is not love!” which geeks like me would write as lust != love.
Mr. Paul Kokoski of Hamilton, Ontario is a darling of the NY Times, Washington Post, and now the Providence Journal. For variations of his letters supporting Benny the Rat (Otherwise known as Pope Benedict the XVI) click here, and here is the google search.
Apparently this guy doesn’t stop. And it doesn’t matter where you live, he’s coming to get you. If you’d like to contact Mr. Kokoski send him an email.
I present his latest screed:
Lust is not love!
01:00 AM EDT on Wednesday, June 6, 2007
Concerning the April 24 letter “Love one another” by Linda S. Chandler: Many who support homosexual acts tend to recklessly characterize those in society who disagree with them as homophobic — the term “homophobia” itself intended to denote a disorder. Contrary to what Ms. Chandler writes, however, it is possible to condemn sin without condemning the person who engages in immoral activity.
All parents are aware of this when they, for good reason, discipline their children. The parent still loves the child despite the child’s failings.
The same sentiments are found in the Bible and the teachings of Jesus.
Jesus, who came to fulfill the law of the Old Testament, did not condemn the woman caught in adultery. However, he made it clear to her that she was to “go and sin no more.” This latter part of Christ’s teaching is often neglected by those, such as Chandler, who wish to offer a selective interpretation of Scripture in order to justify their own desires and whims.
The Bible, however, clearly and unequivocally condemns homosexual acts (Gen 1:27-28; Gen 2:24; Matt 19: 4-6; Rom 1:24-27; 1 Cor 6:10; 1 Tim 1:10 etc.). Sin is not about “inclusion, love and tolerance.” Ultimately, Chandler has misinterpreted Christianity by confusing love with lust.
Indeed, once again he trots out tired religious arguments. And he makes a very big stretch with some of them, including the Genesis citations.
He violates his own beliefs because what he is preaching is not about inclusion, love and tolerance. It is about exclusion and hatred. Mr. Kokoski wants to be your bedroom police. I was rather surprised he didn’t bring out the old familiar citation from Leviticus.
You can’t choose which sections of the bible you wish to believe. It’s an all or nothing thing if you have faith. That’s why I find citation of bible verses to be so offensive, it misses the OTHER message of the book.
Such other messages can be found in Luke 10:27, Luke 6:37, or dare I suggest it, 6:41. Perhaps John 13:34, John 15:12,17, Romans 12:9-10, 15-21 and so on. It appears that the messages of love far outnumber the messages of hate proposed by Kokoski.
While he has to write letter after letter to newspapers I just take the shotgun approach and post it here. Mr. Kokoski needs his own blog so we can all blacklist it.
A good use for parking meters January 14, 2007Posted by truthspew in abuse, Error 10048, parking, politics, vigilance.
add a comment
My interest in this article was piqued because it related to parking meters. In essence, if you’re a resident of a city you’re not only paying taxes to support the infrastructure, etc. You’re paying it over and over and over again.
And here in Providence, RI they’ve installed close to 2,000 new parking meters as well as red light cameras (Which I’ve ranted about in a previous post.)
But who would have thought of using parking meters for explosives testing. I do note of those several thousand new meters in my city, some seem to go missing on a regular basis. You just see the depression where the meter was ripped out.